asn.dev

Observed topology

AS198781 G3NS

Upstreams 22 carry this network
Downstreams 1 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 22
Adjacent (IPv6) 4

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS198781: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv41,431
AS3491PCCW Global (HK) Ltd.TransitIPv4139
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv496
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv480
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv472
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv631
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv4 IPv624
AS3741Dimension DataUnclassifiedIPv421
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv420
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv420
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv420
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv413
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv413
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv613
AS50304Blix Solutions ASUnclassifiedIPv412
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv411
AS198148Gateway CommunicationsUnclassifiedIPv410
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv44
AS8966EMIRATES TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP COMPANY (ETISALAT GROUP) PJSCMobileIPv42
AS64073Vetta GroupUnclassifiedIPv41
AS24115EquinixHostingIPv41
AS15802Emirates Integrated Telecommunications Company PJSCUnclassifiedIPv61

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS198781 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS8791Kerv Experience LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4159

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

26 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS198781 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv41,551
AS8791Kerv Experience LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4159
AS3491PCCW Global (HK) Ltd.TransitIPv4139
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv496
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv489
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv487
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv634
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv4 IPv624
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv423
AS3741Dimension DataUnclassifiedIPv421
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv420
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv420
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv416
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv416
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv616
AS50304Blix Solutions ASUnclassifiedIPv412
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv411
AS198148Gateway CommunicationsUnclassifiedIPv410
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv44
AS8966EMIRATES TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP COMPANY (ETISALAT GROUP) PJSCMobileIPv42
AS24115EquinixHostingIPv41
AS15802Emirates Integrated Telecommunications Company PJSCUnclassifiedIPv61
AS64073Vetta GroupUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS198781, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 12 exchanges across 7 countries and 4 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.193.1891,073
LINX LON1London, United Kingdom195.66.226.64925
NAPAfrica IX JohannesburgJohannesburg, South Africa196.60.10.205603
Megaport IX SydneySydney, Australia103.26.68.103271
Equinix Internet Exchange SydneySydney, Australia45.127.173.82238
Equinix Internet Exchange Hong KongHong Kong, China2001:de8:7::13:2865:1232
New York International Internet ExchangeNew York, United States198.32.160.204217
NAPAfrica IX DurbanDurban, South Africa196.10.141.104146
Megaport Frankfurt IXFrankfurt, Germany62.69.146.41114
MegaPort IX SingaporeSingapore, Singapore103.41.12.5246
Megaport DallasDallas, United States206.53.174.3331
Megaport IX Los AngelesLos Angeles, United States206.53.172.3930

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.