asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS15704 XTRA Telecom

Residential APNIC

IPv4 addresses 836K 244 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 25 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly ES
Exchanges 3 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 12 29 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

XTRA Telecom

Spain · AI-generated

isp mobile telecom business

Eight hundred thousand addresses, four brands, and three spellings of the same abuse contact.

What it's used for

  • A telecoms group's network. Two hundred and fifty-two IPv4 prefixes and twenty-five IPv6 prefixes announced from Spain, eight hundred and thirty-five thousand addresses, across ninety-two observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • The blocks carry netnames from at least four different brands, including a mobile operator, a fixed operator and a cable company, all under one number.
  • The group's abuse contact appears three ways across those blocks: as one word with no separator, as three words with spaces, and as a company abbreviation followed by the registry's name.
  • One netname is the block's own address with the dots replaced by hyphens, in mixed case, and the same netname is used for two different blocks.
  • One block lists only an abuse contact, with no company at all.
  • The single answering address returns a name with no address in it, shared across the range.
  • Eighteen addresses were queried and one returned a name.

Interesting

  • Three spellings of one abuse contact is what a merger does to a registry. Each acquired company's blocks got the new owner's contact written in whatever form the person doing the editing used that day, and nothing ever normalised them.
  • A netname made of the block's own address is redundant while it is right and misleading the moment the block is split, which here it already has been.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 3 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
DE-CIX MadridMadrid, Spain185.1.192.45
ESpanix Madrid Lower LANMadrid, Spain193.149.1.103
IXPlay Global PeersMadrid, Spain185.1.90.6

Transit providers

12 upstream, 29 downstream and 54 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS1299Arelion Sweden AB6,366
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLC5,156
AS174Cogent Communications, LLC3,044
AS5511Orange S.A.2,121
AS6453TATA COMMUNICATIONS (AMERICA) INC1,442
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC915
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG364
AS12338Euskaltel S.A.342

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 244 prefixes · 836K addresses IPv6 25 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
ESSpain269

Registry

Allocation record

APNIC · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
APNIC
Handle
AS15704
Registry name
AS15704
Registrant
MUNDI-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse.es@masorange.es
Registered
2002-01-18
Last changed
2026-06-05
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
99.7% valid · 367 valid, 1 with no ROA
ROAs
242 authorising AS15704
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
98% registered · 359 of 368 announcements
Route objects
183 naming AS15704

Reputation

Classification and threat

Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check