asn.dev

Observed topology

AS151302 HJ-HIDDOS Hebei Sea Whale Technology Co. Ltd.

Unclassified APNIC

Upstreams 2 carry this network
Downstreams 1 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 3
Adjacent (IPv6) 0
Upstream graph Who carries AS151302, and who carries them, drawn as a map up to the transit-free core. 0 exchanges Where AS151302 physically turns up to peer, and its address on each fabric.

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS151302: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS9929CHINA UNICOM Industrial Internet BackboneUnclassifiedIPv4348
AS133115HK Kwaifong Group LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4118

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS151302 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS131574Beijing Haiyu Technology Co. Ltd..UnclassifiedIPv4116

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

observed

Every AS seen directly next to AS151302 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS9929CHINA UNICOM Industrial Internet BackboneUnclassifiedIPv4464
AS133115HK Kwaifong Group LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4118
AS131574Beijing Haiyu Technology Co. Ltd..UnclassifiedIPv4116

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-19 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.17M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.