asn.dev

Observed topology

AS149522 ONECUBITCOLTD-AS-AP OneCubit Co., Ltd.

Upstreams 17 carry this network
Downstreams 6 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 17
Adjacent (IPv6) 15

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS149522: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6151
AS2914NTT America, Inc.TransitIPv4 IPv6130
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6129
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6111
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv669
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv68
AS60068Datacamp LimitedHostingIPv44
AS394256Tech Futures Interactive Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv63
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv63
AS9957KINXHostingIPv4 IPv63
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv42
AS3130RGnet OUUnclassifiedIPv42
AS7575Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet)EducationIPv42
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv42
AS38001NewMedia Express Pte LtdHostingIPv42
AS8966EMIRATES TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP COMPANY (ETISALAT GROUP) PJSCMobileIPv41
AS15412Flag Telecom UK LimitedUnclassifiedIPv61

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS149522 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS132088Wind Cloud Network Technology Co LtdHostingIPv6681
AS204091Rivulet Wireless Inc.UnclassifiedIPv6185
AS150414OneCubit Co., Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv672
AS1064Rivulet Wireless Inc.UnclassifiedIPv459
AS138986INAP Japan Tokyo Shiohama DCUnclassifiedIPv638
AS150314Rivulet NetworksUnclassifiedIPv638

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

32 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS149522 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS132088Wind Cloud Network Technology Co LtdHostingIPv6681
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6519
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6504
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6231
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6187
AS204091Rivulet Wireless Inc.UnclassifiedIPv6185
AS2914NTT America, Inc.TransitIPv4 IPv6165
AS150414OneCubit Co., Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv672
AS1064Rivulet Wireless Inc.UnclassifiedIPv459
AS150314Rivulet NetworksUnclassifiedIPv638
AS138986INAP Japan Tokyo Shiohama DCUnclassifiedIPv638
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv635
AS15412Flag Telecom UK LimitedUnclassifiedIPv621
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv67
AS394256Tech Futures Interactive Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv66
AS60068Datacamp LimitedHostingIPv44
AS9957KINXHostingIPv4 IPv64
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv43
AS38001NewMedia Express Pte LtdHostingIPv43
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv42
AS7575Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet)EducationIPv42
AS3130RGnet OUUnclassifiedIPv42
AS8966EMIRATES TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP COMPANY (ETISALAT GROUP) PJSCMobileIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS149522, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 6 exchanges across 4 countries and 2 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
BroadBand Internet eXchange TokyoTokyo, Japan101.203.90.27359
Seattle Internet ExchangeSeattle, United States206.81.80.188350
JPIX TokyoTokyo, Japan210.171.225.19259
Equinix Internet Exchange Hong KongHong Kong, China2001:de8:7::14:9522:1232
Equinix Internet Exchange TokyoTokyo, Japan2001:de8:5::14:9522:1124
Korea Internet Neutral Exchange KINXSeoul, South Korea139.150.100.5664

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.