asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS14778 YAHOO

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 1.54K 5 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 9 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 2 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Yahoo Holdings

United States · AI-generated

enterprise business infrastructure

Nine IPv6 blocks from three continents, every one numbered from the same slice.

What it's used for

  • Corporate and office network space for a large internet company. 1,536 IPv4 addresses across five prefixes, nine IPv6 prefixes, and two observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • The IPv6 announcements come from three unrelated ranges, 2001:4998:ef6f::/48, 2406:6e00:ef98::/48 and 2a00:1288:efc1::/48 among them, and every one of the nine carries ef in the same position.
  • Registry records span three regions: A-YAHOO-US11, CH-YAHOO, and YAHOOTWCIC and YAHOOISNET-AS-AP with an incident response team named as contact.
  • All fifteen sampled addresses answered. Thirteen returned the identical name unknown.yahoo.com.
  • The two exceptions are temp-clearpass1.net.corp.tw1.yahoo.com and nat-vpn-users9.cfw-a-usr.net.tw1.fy94.net.

Interesting

  • The shared marker across nine blocks is one internal numbering plan applied on top of address space obtained from three different registries. The company decided what its own blocks would be called and then made the regional allocations fit, which is the sort of discipline only an organisation with a global addressing team manages.
  • One wildcard name on every address is a reasonable way to publish nothing, and the two names that escaped it are more revealing than the thousands that did not. One marks a network access control appliance labelled as temporary; the other is a shared address for staff on the corporate virtual private network, published under an unbranded domain that gives no hint of the company.
  • Naming a security incident team as registry contact on the regional records is the practice a network this size should follow everywhere.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

2 upstream, 0 downstream and 4 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS10310Yahoo Holdings Inc.578
AS12400Partner Communications Ltd.93

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-20, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 5 prefixes · 1.54K addresses IPv6 9 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America14

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS14776
Registry name
YAHOO
Registrant
Yahoo Holdings Inc.
Abuse contact
rir-abuse@yahooinc.com
Registered
2000-02-07
Last changed
2020-07-21
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 15 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS14778
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
40% registered · 6 of 15 announcements 4 other origin
Route objects
62 naming AS14778

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,778 prefixes, as published 2026-10-20. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check