asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS13994 OMU-1

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 14.85K 12 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 4 2 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Owensboro Municipal Utilities

United States · AI-generated

isp government infrastructure

A misspelling of the word municipal survives in three separate registry records.

What it's used for

  • A municipal utility's internet network. 14,336 addresses across 14 IPv4 prefixes, five observed BGP neighbours, and no IPv6 announced.

Notable

  • Six blocks including 161.115.192.0/20 and 184.154.224.0/21 register to Owensboro Municipal Utilities under the netname OMU-1.
  • 63.147.92.0/22, 63.238.104.0/23, 208.47.90.0/23 and 208.47.92.0/23 register to CKY Owensboro Municiple.
  • 216.135.48.0/22 uses the netname OWENSBORO-MUNICIPAL-UTILITIES-REALLOCATION.
  • 70.159.112.0/23 uses BLS-70-159-112-0-23-1007272112, and its registrant reads Owensboro Municipal Utilities - OWB LAN.
  • Eighteen addresses were queried for reverse DNS and none returned a name.

Interesting

  • Municiple is a typo, and it appears in four blocks' records because the string was copied forward rather than retyped. Registry data propagates by duplication, so a single mistake at the first assignment outlives everyone who made it.
  • Two different blocks share the netname QWEST-208-47-90, which names only the first of them. The second was carved from adjacent space and inherited the label unchanged.
  • The BLS- netname packs a carrier code, the full prefix in dotted-then-hyphenated form, the prefix length, and a ten-digit number that reads as a timestamp. Everything needed to reconstruct when the assignment was made is sitting in the name.
  • A city-owned electricity utility running its own AS number and fourteen thousand addresses is municipal broadband. The same organisation that maintains the poles is selling what hangs on them.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

4 upstream, 2 downstream and 6 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS393444Accelecom2,288
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLC367
AS10796Charter Communications Inc348
AS7029Windstream Communications LLC166

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-15, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 12 prefixes · 14.85K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America12

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS13994
Registry name
OMU-1
Registrant
Owensboro Municipal Utilities
Abuse contact
stewartcm@omu.org
Registered
1999-09-29
Last changed
2012-03-02
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
63% valid · 31 valid, 18 with no ROA
ROAs
57 authorising AS13994
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 49 of 49 announcements
Route objects
82 naming AS13994

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,781 prefixes, as published 2026-10-16. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check