Autonomous system
AS13287 NIXVAL NIXVAL Datacenter
Hosting RIPE
Summary
Nixval
hosting transit business
Forty-five prefixes, four companies' netnames, and three sampled addresses in three unrelated domains.
What it's used for
- The network of a Spanish datacentre operator. 13,056 addresses across twenty-four IPv4 prefixes, twenty-one IPv6 prefixes, and fifty-seven observed BGP neighbours.
Notable
- The AS handle is
NIXVAL NIXVAL Datacenter, with the name repeated. - Ten blocks share the single netname
ES-NIXVAL-20000418; others areES-OCCENTUS-20100715,ES-FEROZ-20130816andES-SATELVEX-20150709, each registered to a different company. - The IPv6 list under
2a02:23a0::runs/44,/47, two/48s,/46,/45,/43,/42,/41. - Sampled names are
mx02.perimeter.email,static-254.70.19.185.realoja.comandmi-servidor-213-162-214-254.nodenet.net.
Interesting
- Every sampled address answered in a different domain belonging to a different party, which is what a hosting network looks like from the outside. The addresses are the operator's and the names on them are the tenants'.
- The doubling ladder of IPv6 prefixes is the output of a tool splitting one range into the fewest legal blocks, and it fills twenty-one slots in every full routing table on the internet to describe space that was contiguous to begin with.
- Ten separate announcements carrying one netname dated April 2000 means one old allocation broken into ten routes while keeping a single registry label. The routing table records the fragmentation and the registry does not.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 3 exchanges in 2 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| DE-CIX Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 80.81.194.62 |
| DE-CIX Madrid | Madrid, Spain | 185.1.192.10 |
| ESpanix Madrid Lower LAN | Madrid, Spain | 193.149.1.30 |
Transit providers
13 upstream, 19 downstream and 44 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 26 prefixes · 13.57K addresses IPv6 21 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| ES | Spain | 47 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS13287- Registry name
- NIXVAL
- Registrant
- AS13287-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@nixval.com
- Registered
- 1970-01-01
- Last changed
- 2025-07-24
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- NIXVAL
- Also known as
- NIXVAL
- Scope
- Regional
- Traffic ratio
- Balanced
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-NIXVAL-TRANSIT- Present at
- 5 exchanges
- Facilities
- 2 facilities
- Website
- https://www.nixval.com
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 92% valid · 57 valid, 5 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 30 authorising AS13287
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 62 of 62 announcements
- Route objects
- 89 naming AS13287
Reputation
Classification and threat
Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere