asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS13037 ZEN-AS Zen Internet - UK

Residential RIPE

IPv4 addresses 528K 36 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly GB
Exchanges 3 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 16 3 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Zen Internet

United Kingdom · AI-generated

isp hosting business

An ISP whose forward hostnames contain the label in-addr, borrowed from the reverse tree.

What it's used for

  • A British internet provider. 527,616 addresses across 36 IPv4 prefixes, one IPv6 prefix, and 94 observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • Netnames are mostly UK-ZEN, dated 20010629, 20020703, 20030428 and 20100604, with two left bare.
  • One breaks the pattern entirely: ZEN20110301-DAR-ZEN-ADSL13, date first, no country prefix, and a suffix naming a product and a numbered block.
  • Sixteen of eighteen sampled addresses returned names in two forms: 82-68-128-0.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk and 51-148-64-0.dsl.zen.co.uk.
  • One address answers mailgate.cj-dev.uk, a customer's own domain.

Interesting

  • in-addr inside a forward hostname is the record worth pausing on. That label belongs to in-addr.arpa, the tree reverse lookups are answered from; it has no meaning under zen.co.uk. Someone building the generated zone copied the shape of the reverse hierarchy into the forward name, and the newer blocks dropped it. Two generations of the same script are visible side by side.
  • A customer domain appearing in the middle of ISP-generated space means that address has a manually set name overriding the template. Business lines get named for what they run; consumer lines get named for their address.
  • Six dated netnames spanning 2001 to 2011 track a provider that kept coming back for more space across a decade.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 3 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
LINX LON1London, United Kingdom195.66.224.158
London Network Access PointLondon, United Kingdom5.57.80.48
LINX ManchesterManchester, United Kingdom195.66.244.28

Transit providers

16 upstream, 3 downstream and 28 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS1299Arelion Sweden AB598
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC349
AS2914NTT America, Inc.336
AS6461Zayo Bandwidth332
AS9002RETN Limited225
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbH74
AS24482SG.GS38
AS37721Virtual Technologies & Solutions38

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-14, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 36 prefixes · 528K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
GBUnited Kingdom37

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS13037
Registry name
ZEN-AS
Registrant
Zen Internet Ltd
Abuse contact
abuse@zen.co.uk
Registered
2002-09-20
Last changed
2023-08-02
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
82% valid · 31 valid, 7 with no ROA
ROAs
33 authorising AS13037
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 38 of 38 announcements
Route objects
313 naming AS13037

Reputation

Classification and threat

Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check