asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS12912 TM

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 1.09M 209 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 19 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly PL
Exchanges 4 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 17 204 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

T-Mobile Polska

Poland · AI-generated

mobile telecom isp

A national mobile carrier whose address blocks are still named after the brand it replaced.

What it's used for

  • The mobile network of a Polish operator. 1,092,608 addresses across 209 IPv4 prefixes, 19 IPv6 prefixes, and 316 observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • Eight of the twelve sampled blocks carry the bare netname ERANET, with no date and no country prefix.
  • Two more are PL-ERANET-20090401 and PL-ERANET-20100203.
  • Two are PL-ENERGIS-20010801 and PL-ENERGIS-20020903, registered to a different operator's IP team alongside the current holder.
  • The AS handle is TM.
  • Fifteen of eighteen sampled addresses returned names, in three forms: 178.180.128.0.nat.umts.dynamic.t-mobile.pl, 37.31.64.0.mobile.internet.t-mobile.pl and 188.147.191.254.mobile.static.t-mobile.pl.

Interesting

  • ERANET names a mobile brand that no longer exists. The company rebranded, the reverse names were all updated to the new name, and the netnames were left exactly as they were. Reverse DNS is customer-facing so it gets fixed; netnames are seen by almost nobody, so they become the most reliable record of what a company used to be called.
  • The reverse names sort subscribers into three classes and say so plainly: carrier NAT over the mobile network, ordinary mobile internet, and static addressing. Anyone receiving traffic can tell which kind of connection it came from before doing anything else, which is exactly what abuse and fraud systems use these names for.
  • The ENERGIS blocks are a fixed-line operator absorbed into a mobile one, and both companies' contacts are still listed on them.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 4 exchanges in 2 countries, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.194.32
TPIX - Internet ExchangeWarsaw, Poland195.149.232.56
Equinix Internet Exchange WarsawWarsaw, Poland195.182.218.156
Thinx IXWarsaw, Poland212.91.1.14

Transit providers

17 upstream, 204 downstream and 251 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS3320Deutsche Telekom AG996
AS1299Arelion Sweden AB738
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbH448
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC400
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG117
AS24482SG.GS49
AS34019Hivane Association30
AS48362Stadtwerke Feldkirch30

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 209 prefixes · 1.09M addresses IPv6 19 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
PLPoland228

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS12912
Registry name
TMPL
Registrant
AS12912-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@t-mobile.pl
Registered
2002-07-16
Last changed
2022-03-23
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
84% valid · 42 valid, 8 with no ROA
ROAs
56 authorising AS12912
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 50 of 50 announcements
Route objects
100 naming AS12912

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check