Autonomous system
AS12859 NL-BIT BIT BV
Hosting RIPE
Summary
BIT BV
hosting isp infrastructure
1,350 BGP neighbours, and routers named after dead physicists.
What it's used for
- A Dutch hosting and connectivity provider. 58,112 addresses across 44 IPv4 prefixes, eighteen IPv6 prefixes, and 1,350 observed BGP neighbours.
Notable
- The largest blocks are
87.251.32.0/19,213.136.0.0/19,213.154.224.0/19,212.72.240.0/20and212.114.96.0/20. - Netnames run
NL-BIT-991209,NL-BIT-20000522,20030129,20050909and20100528;178.22.56.0/21isNL-EXONET-20100401, registered to a different company. - Two of eighteen sampled addresses returned names:
homit-gw.jun1.galilei.network.bit.nland213-136-23-254.colo.bit.nl.
Interesting
- 1,350 neighbours is the second-highest count seen anywhere in this range, against a very ordinary 58,112 addresses. A provider that peers with everyone reachable is buying short paths for its hosting customers, and the neighbour count reflects an exchange-heavy strategy rather than size.
jun1.galileinames a specific router: a vendor abbreviation, an index, and a hostname from a naming scheme built on scientists. Naming machines after a theme is how operators keep hundreds of devices memorable, and it survives into public DNS because the reverse zone is generated from the same inventory the engineers use.NL-BIT-991209is a two-digit year from December 1999, filed days after four-digit netnames elsewhere in this range, and this holder's very next block in May 2000 uses four digits. Even within one organisation the format was not settled, which is what you would expect if it was never a rule in the first place.- One block belongs to another company entirely. Hosting providers absorb smaller ones, and the acquired network's registry record is the last thing anyone gets round to changing.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 7 exchanges in 3 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| DE-CIX Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 80.81.192.95 |
| LINX LON1 | London, United Kingdom | 195.66.225.51 |
| AMS-IX Amsterdam | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 80.249.208.35 |
| Neutral Internet Exchange | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 193.239.116.19 |
| The Frys Internet Exchange | Frysian, Netherlands | 2001:7f8:10f::323b:186 |
| ERA-IX Amsterdam | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 185.1.240.201 |
| Neutral Internet Exchange 2 | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 185.1.122.135 |
Transit providers
32 upstream, 267 downstream and 500 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-14, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 44 prefixes · 58.11K addresses IPv6 19 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| NL | Netherlands | 63 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS12859- Registry name
- NL-BIT
- Registrant
- AS12859-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@bit.nl
- Registered
- 2002-09-19
- Last changed
- 2026-09-08
- Allocation
- allocated
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 98% valid · 149 valid, 3 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 240 authorising AS12859
- ASPA
- 3 declared providers
- IRR
- 100% registered · 152 of 152 announcements
- Route objects
- 78 naming AS12859
Reputation
Classification and threat
Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere