asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9950 PUBNETPLUS2-AS-KR DACOM-PUBNETPLUS

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 63.23K 55 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly KR
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 1 4 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

LG U+ PUBNETPLUS (ex-DACOM)

South Korea · AI-generated

government isp business legacy

AS9950 (PUBNETPLUS2-AS-KR) is registered as DACOM-PUBNETPLUS. PUBNETPLUS is the Korean national information-and-communications service that LG U+ operates for government agencies, public institutions and schools; DACOM was the fixed-line carrier that ran it before being absorbed into LG U+ in the 2010 merger of LG Telecom, Dacom and Powercom. The service still carries the Dacom name in the registry and the PUBNETPLUS name in LG U+'s own public-sector product line.

What it's used for

This is a public-sector access network rather than a consumer ISP. RIS sees 24 IPv4 prefixes carrying 66,560 addresses and no IPv6. The structure is a single large aggregate, 58.184.0.0/16, plus about twenty /24 deaggregates carved out of that same /16 and announced alongside it, with a couple of strays from 211.40.x, 211.42.x and 61.108.x. Announcing both the covering /16 and its more-specifics is deliberate traffic engineering — it lets individual government or institutional sites be steered independently while the aggregate still covers everything.

Five observed neighbours places it squarely as a downstream access network. It reaches the internet through a small number of upstreams inside the LG U+ estate and terminates that connectivity at public-sector customers; it is not selling transit to anybody.

Notable

  • The PUBNETPLUS2 in the handle marks it as the second of the PUBNETPLUS ASNs — AS9316 also carries the DACOM-PUBNETPLUS name. Describe the network in front of you, not the group: this is one slice of a larger public-sector service.
  • Address space registered to a carrier but used by government and educational bodies is why geolocation and threat-intel feeds often mislabel this range as generic Korean broadband.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

1 upstream, 4 downstream and 5 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS17841NATIONAL INFORMATION RESOURCES SERVICE1,518

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 55 prefixes · 63.23K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
KRKorea, Republic of55

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS9950
Registry name
PUBNETPLUS2-AS-KR-KR
Abuse contact
hostmaster@nic.or.kr
Registered
2000-04-14
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 237 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS9950
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
90% registered · 214 of 237 announcements
Route objects
133 naming AS9950

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 440 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check