Autonomous system
AS9927 PHILCOMNET-PH Philippine Global Communications Corporation
Unclassified APNIC
Summary
PhilCom (Philippine Global Communications Corporation)
isp business transit legacy
AS9927 (PHILCOMNET-PH) is held by Philippine Global Communications Corporation, trading as PhilCom, a telecommunications carrier and ISP headquartered in Makati City. It is one of the older Philippine carriers to hold its own ASN and operates as a multihomed commercial internet provider.
What it's used for
The routing evidence points at a mid-sized commercial ISP rather than a mass-market eyeball network. RIS sees 67 IPv4 prefixes carrying only 17,152 addresses — an average of roughly a /24 apiece, which is the signature of a network handing out small, individually routed blocks to business customers rather than aggregating large residential pools. The announced space is drawn from three separate APNIC ranges (202.57.x, 58.97.x, 45.64.x, plus 103.21.13.0/24), consistent with allocations picked up over a long period. A single IPv6 prefix, 2405:d400::/32, is announced. The 37 observed neighbours is the interesting number: that is far more peering than an enterprise or a pure access network of this size would ever need, and it lines up with PhilCom's own positioning as a multihomed carrier that both buys transit from several upstreams and resells connectivity onward to Philippine corporate customers and smaller providers.
Notable
- Sits in the second tier of Philippine carriers — smaller in address terms than the PLDT or Globe eyeball networks, but with a peering footprint out of proportion to its size.
- The many-prefixes-few-addresses shape is typical of a leased-line and corporate-connectivity business, where each customer site gets its own routed block.
- The
45.64.xand103.xspace is recent-era APNIC allocation, showing the network has kept growing past its original assignments.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 4 exchanges in 3 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| Equinix Internet Exchange Singapore | Singapore, Singapore | 27.111.230.244 |
| Hong Kong Internet Exchange | Hong Kong, China | 123.255.92.66 |
| GetaFIX Manila | Manila, Philippines | 103.104.19.21 |
| Philippine Open Internet Exchange | Manila, Philippines | 198.32.172.87 |
Transit providers
7 upstream, 4 downstream and 18 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 16 prefixes · 17.15K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| PH | Philippines | 17 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS9927- Registry name
- PHILCOMNET-PH
- Registrant
- PhilCom Corporation
- Abuse contact
- abuse@philcom.com
- Registered
- 2008-09-04
- Last changed
- 2025-02-25
- Allocation
- allocated
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 68 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 73 authorising AS9927
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 99% registered · 67 of 68 announcements
- Route objects
- 249 naming AS9927
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 432 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere