Autonomous system
AS9915 LEEMON-AS Leemon Professional Consultant
Unclassified APNIC Network Services
Summary
Leemon Professional Consultant
legacy
AS9915 (LEEMON-AS) is registered to Leemon Professional Consultant, a Taiwanese company. Beyond the registry entry and its PeeringDB record there is very little public information about the business, so this card sticks to what the routing and interconnection evidence actually shows rather than guessing at a role.
What it's used for
RIS sees two IPv4 prefixes totalling 512 addresses — the adjacent 103.67.160.0/24 and 103.67.161.0/24 — with no IPv6 and 8 observed BGP neighbours. The interesting part is the ratio. Eight neighbours is a lot of peering for a network that announces only two /24s, and PeeringDB confirms why: AS9915 sits on a 10G port at TPIX, the Taipei Internet Exchange, out of the Chief LY Building in Taipei, with an open peering policy and no ratio or contract requirements.
That profile — minimal address space, a real IX port, open peering — is what you see from a small operator that cares more about interconnection quality than about scale. It is consistent with a consultancy or managed-services firm running its own AS so that it can peer directly rather than sit behind a single upstream, but the evidence does not settle what actually rides the space.
Notable
- The two announced
/24s are contiguous, so this is one small APNIC allocation announced as its component halves rather than an assembled inventory. - Traffic levels in PeeringDB are marked "Not Disclosed", and the network does not use TPIX's route servers, preferring bilateral sessions.
- The website listed in the PeeringDB record does not currently resolve.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| Taipei Internet Exchange (TPIX) | Taipei, Taiwan | 203.163.222.165 |
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-26, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 1 prefixes · 512 addresses IPv6 0 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| TW | Taiwan, Province of China | 1 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS9915- Registry name
- LEEMON-AS
- Abuse contact
- tank@ip.consult.tw
- Registered
- 2023-01-18
- Last changed
- 2023-01-18
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- Leemon Professional Consultant
- Network type
- Network Services
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Traffic ratio
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- Present at
- 1 exchanges
- Facilities
- 1 facilities
- Website
- http://ip.consult.tw
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 2 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 3 authorising AS9915
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 2 of 2 announcements
- Route objects
- 7 naming AS9915
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 446 networks and 1,852 prefixes, as published 2026-10-27. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere