asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9655 TPMNETWORK-AS-AP TPM Corp. Berhad

Unclassified APNIC

IPv4 addresses 3.07K 4 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly MY
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 2 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Technology Park Malaysia (TPM Corp)

Malaysia · AI-generated

enterprise isp legacy

AS9655 (TPMNETWORK-AS-AP) is held by TPM Corp. Berhad — Technology Park Malaysia Corporation, the operator of the Technology Park Malaysia campus at Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur. The AS is the park's network service arm: the abuse contact and the address range sit under tpm.com.my, the park's own domain.

What it's used for

The evidence describes a campus network, not a general ISP. RIS sees 12 IPv4 prefixes totalling 3,072 addresses and no IPv6, announced through only 2 observed neighbours. Every prefix is a /24 and every one falls inside 202.129.160.0/20 — 202.129.160.0/24 up to 202.129.175.0/24, contiguous and drawn from a single APNIC allocation. There is no scattered inventory, no third-party space and no aggregate held elsewhere.

That combination is characteristic of a science- and technology-park operator that provides connectivity to its own tenants. TPM's registrable /20 gets carved into /24s so that individual tenant organisations on the campus can have their own visible block, while TPM buys transit from a couple of Malaysian carriers and announces the lot under one ASN. It is an ISP in function but with a fixed, campus-bounded customer set: the address footprint has not grown beyond the original allocation, which a commercial ISP's would have.

Notable

  • "TPM Corp. Berhad" is a technology-park operator, not a telecoms company — the ISP role exists to serve the park's tenants.
  • The whole announced inventory is one /20 deaggregated into /24s, which is why the prefix count (12) looks high relative to the small address total.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

2 upstream, 0 downstream and 3 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS9930TIME dotCom Berhad No. 14, Jalan Majistret U1/26 Hicom Glenmarie Industrial Park 40150 Shah Alam Selangor, Malaysia480
AS4788TM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SDN. BHD.288

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 4 prefixes · 3.07K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
MYMalaysia4

Registry

Allocation record

APNIC · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
APNIC
Handle
AS9655
Registry name
TPMNETWORK-AS-AP
Registrant
Technology Park Malaysia Corporation Sdn. Bhd
Abuse contact
abuse@mranti.my
Registered
2008-09-04
Last changed
2023-07-25
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 12 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS9655
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 12 of 12 announcements
Route objects
81 naming AS9655

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check