asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9600 SONYTELECOM So-net Corporation

Unclassified APNIC

IPv4 addresses 82.94K 15 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly JP
Exchanges 1 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 1 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

So-net / bit-drive (Sony group business ISP)

Japan · AI-generated

isp enterprise legacy

AS9600 (SONYTELECOM) is registered to So-net Corporation, the Sony group's ISP business (now Sony Network Communications). The reverse DNS shows what the AS actually carries: every sampled address resolves under cust.bit-drive.ne.jp. bit-drive is the Sony group's corporate network and cloud service brand, not the consumer So-net product.

What it's used for

This is a business-access network. It announces 15 IPv4 prefixes totalling 82,944 addresses, mostly /19s and /20s scattered across many unrelated parent blocks (219.106.224.0/19, 211.9.32.0/19, 61.45.192.0/19, 210.172.0.0/19 and so on), plus a single IPv6 /32, 2001:298::/32. That fragmented, many-small-blocks footprint is what a provider accumulates by assigning customer subnets over years, and the cust. label in the PTRs confirms the addresses are handed to customers rather than used for the operator's own servers. Only one observed BGP neighbour, on ~83k addresses, rules out any wholesale-transit role entirely: this AS sits behind its upstream and serves the businesses connected to it, over the fibre, VPN and managed-connectivity products bit-drive sells.

Notable

  • Do not read this as Sony's consumer eyeball network. So-net's residential broadband and NURO subscribers live on a different AS. AS9600 is the corporate side.
  • The bit-drive corporate cloud and network business was moved by corporate split to Sony Biz Networks Corporation, so the marketing brand and the registered AS holder no longer match exactly. The registry still says So-net.
  • The mix of 61.x, 202.x, 203.x, 210.x, 211.x, 218.x, 219.x and a modern 103.22.152.0/22 reflects a long allocation history rather than one contiguous grant.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
Network Service Provider IXP (Distributed IX in Edo)Tokyo, Japan202.249.2.71

Transit providers

1 upstream, 0 downstream and 2 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS2527Sony Network Communications Inc.918

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 15 prefixes · 82.94K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
JPJapan16

Registry

Allocation record

APNIC · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
APNIC
Handle
AS9600
Registry name
SONYTELECOM
Abuse contact
hostmaster@nic.ad.jp
Registered
1999-08-05
Last changed
2014-05-21
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 16 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS9600
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 16 of 16 announcements
Route objects
33 naming AS9600

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check