asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9509 DEWR-AS-AP Department of Employment and Workplace Relations

Unclassified APNIC

IPv4 addresses 73.73K 10 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 2 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly AU
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 1 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR)

Australia · AI-generated

government enterprise legacy

AS9509 (DEWR-AS-AP) is registered to the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, an Australian Government department in the employment and workplace-relations portfolio. It is a departmental enterprise network, not a service provider.

What it's used for

The AS carries the department's own corporate and public-facing address space. RIS sees 4 IPv4 prefixes totalling 74,240 addresses plus 2 IPv6 prefixes, and just one BGP neighbour. That single-upstream shape is the classic signature of an end-site enterprise or agency network: it buys transit rather than selling it, and has no peering estate to speak of. The address holdings are lopsided — a legacy 165.12.0.0/16 dominates the count, alongside 221.121.64.0/19 and a pair of /24s (192.207.248.0/24, 202.14.186.0/24) that look like older, separately-acquired assignments. A sampled PTR inside 202.14.186.0/24 resolves to a VPN endpoint under ipaustralia.gov.au, which indicates the AS carries space used by at least one other Commonwealth entity as well as the department itself — a normal pattern for shared Australian Government network arrangements, where one registered AS fronts routing for several agencies.

Notable

  • The department has been renamed and restructured repeatedly across Australian machinery-of-government changes; the AS registration and its address holdings have outlasted several of those names.
  • Address count is dominated by a single legacy /16, far more space than a department of this size would obtain today.
  • One observed neighbour and no peering footprint: transit customer only, consistent with a government end-site.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

1 upstream, 0 downstream and 2 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS38809Vocus Advanced Services304

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-18, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 10 prefixes · 73.73K addresses IPv6 2 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
AUAustralia12

Registry

Allocation record

APNIC · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
APNIC
Handle
AS9509
Registry name
DEWR-AS-AP
Registrant
Department of Employment and Workplace Relations
Abuse contact
internetgatewaymonitoring@dewr.gov.au
Registered
2008-09-04
Last changed
2024-05-15
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
67% valid · 4 valid, 2 with no ROA
ROAs
5 authorising AS9509
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
17% registered · 1 of 6 announcements 2 other origin
Route objects
1 naming AS9509

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,784 prefixes, as published 2026-10-19. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check