asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9425 FITI-AS-BKB2 Future Internet Technology Infrastructure FITI

Education APNIC

IPv4 addresses 0 0 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 25 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly CN
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 1 40 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Future Internet Technology Infrastructure (FITI)

China · AI-generated

research education legacy

AS9425 (FITI-AS-BKB2) is held by Future Internet Technology Infrastructure (FITI), the Chinese national next-generation internet research facility built around CERNET and led by Tsinghua University. FITI is a state science-and-technology infrastructure project: an IPv6-based experimental backbone whose core nodes sit in universities across China.

What it's used for

This is a research backbone, and the routing evidence says so unusually clearly. In the RIS view the AS originates no IPv4 prefixes at all — zero routes, zero IPv4 addresses — and only 2 IPv6 prefixes, 2401:34a0::/32 and 2401:34a1::/32. An operational commercial network of any kind would carry IPv4; a network that has deliberately never had any is making a statement, and FITI's stated design is native IPv6 from the ground up. Against that near-empty prefix list the AS is observed with around 41 BGP neighbours, far more peers than routes. That combination — a wide peering fabric carrying a couple of large IPv6 blocks — is what an experimental backbone interconnecting research institutions looks like: the value is in the paths and the testbed, not in the address inventory. The BKB2 in the handle reads as a backbone element of the facility.

Notable

  • The AS announces IPv6 only. Two /32s is an enormous amount of IPv6 address space and effectively unlimited for a testbed.
  • FITI is associated with CERNET and Tsinghua University and has been publicly described as a high-speed next-generation (IPv6) backbone linking core nodes at universities across China.
  • More neighbours (41) than announced prefixes (2) is the inverse of a normal network and is characteristic of research/interconnection infrastructure.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

1 upstream, 40 downstream and 41 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS38255China Education and Research Network (CERNET)74

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-14, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 0 prefixes · 0 addresses IPv6 25 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
CNChina25

Registry

Allocation record

APNIC · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
APNIC
Handle
AS9425
Registry name
FITI-AS-BKB2
Registrant
China Education and Research Network (CERNET)
Abuse contact
abuse@cernet.edu.cn
Registered
2023-06-21
Last changed
2023-06-21
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 2 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
2 authorising AS9425
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
0% registered · 0 of 2 announcements
Route objects
40 naming AS9425

Reputation

Classification and threat

Education University, school or national research and education network.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-15. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check