asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9387 SHARPTEL-AS-AP SHARP TELECOM PRIVATE LIMITED

Unclassified APNIC

IPv4 addresses 5.38K 12 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 2 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly PK
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 3 2 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Sharp Telecom (Private) Limited

Pakistan · AI-generated

isp legacy

AS9387 (SHARPTEL-AS-AP) is held by Sharp Telecom (Private) Limited, an internet service provider based in Karachi, Pakistan, operating under the sharptel.pk domain. It is a regional provider rather than a national carrier, selling broadband and business connectivity in the Karachi market. The name has no connection to the Japanese electronics manufacturer Sharp.

What it's used for

The routing footprint is small and highly fragmented, which is what an established but modest ISP in an address-poor market looks like. RIS observes 23 IPv4 prefixes totalling only 5,888 addresses — almost every announcement is an individual /24 — alongside two IPv6 prefixes (2401:4100::/33 and a /48 more-specific out of it) and 5 observed BGP neighbours. The IPv4 space is scattered across three unrelated parent ranges (180.178.128.0 upward, 113.203.234–240, plus singleton /24s in 116.0.60.0 and 122.50.2.0), each acquired in small increments over time rather than as one allocation. Five neighbours is consistent with a handful of upstream transit providers and local peering, not with a wholesale role.

Notable

  • The IPv6 holding is far larger than the IPv4 one in relative terms: a /33 is an enormous amount of v6 space next to under 6,000 v4 addresses, a common shape in markets where IPv4 scarcity bites hardest.
  • The single sampled PTR (relay.dubilab.com) reflects a customer or hosted service inside the space. It tells you what the block carries, not who owns it.
  • Fragmented /24-only announcements make a network more exposed to prefix-hijack and filtering issues than a network holding aggregatable space.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

3 upstream, 2 downstream and 6 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS38193Transworld Associates (Pvt.) Ltd.864
AS139820HG TELECOMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED259
AS38264National WiMAX/IMS environment172

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 12 prefixes · 5.38K addresses IPv6 2 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
PKPakistan14

Registry

Allocation record

APNIC · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
APNIC
Handle
AS9387
Registry name
SHARPTEL-AS-AP
Registrant
SHARP TELECOM (PRIVATE) LIMITED
Abuse contact
ipadmin@sharptel.pk
Registered
2009-09-25
Last changed
2020-10-15
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 23 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
40 authorising AS9387
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 23 of 23 announcements
Route objects
128 naming AS9387

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check