asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9081 AS9081 B92-NET Autonomous System

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 4.10K 5 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly RS
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

B92 DOO Beograd

Serbia · AI-generated

enterprise isp legacy

AS9081 is held by "B92" DOO Beograd, the network arm of B92, the well-known Serbian independent broadcaster and media house based in Belgrade.

What it's used for

The AS announces a small footprint (roughly 4,096 IPv4 addresses across a 212.102.128.0/20 block and two more-specifics) with only two observed BGP neighbours. Sampled reverse DNS on the space returns gateway-style names such as speed-g02-2.b92.net, i.e. B92's own infrastructure rather than a broad subscriber pool. The network supports B92's media operation and its associated internet/access services.

Notable

The prefix has been announced since 2001, an early allocation consistent with B92's pioneering role in Serbian internet and independent media during the 1990s and 2000s. The address footprint is small and homed to just two upstreams, so this is a single-organisation network, not a large eyeball ISP.

Interesting

B92 grew from a 1990s Belgrade radio station famous for broadcasting through the Milošević era into a multi-platform media group; the network here reflects that in-house media/ISP heritage rather than a mass-market access business.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Address space

Summary

Full explorer
CountryNamePrefixes
RSSerbia5

Registry

Allocation record

via RIPE RDAP
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS9081
Registry name
AS9081
Registrant
AS9081-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@b92.net
Registered
2002-04-10
Last changed
2017-11-15
Status
active

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check