Autonomous system
AS8905 DIGIT1-AS Digit One Moscow Network
Unclassified RIPE
Summary
Digit One (Almatel)
isp residential legacy
DIGIT1-AS is Digit One LLC (ООО «Цифра Один»), a Moscow internet provider that
trades as Цифра 1 / Almatel. The Almatel group was assembled in 2016 by
merging 2KOM, Digit One and several other local operators, and this AS carries the
combined address space.
What it's used for
- Home internet, IPTV and telephony across Moscow and the surrounding region, plus business connectivity for offices and commercial buildings.
- Roughly 65,000 IPv4 addresses across ~25 prefixes, with three upstream neighbours. No IPv6 is announced.
Notable
- The rDNS is a museum of the operators the group absorbed, and each brand keeps its own naming:
broadband-IP-DASHED.2kom.ruandppp-IP-DASHED.ultranet.ruare clear eyeball subscriber pools, whilecust-NN-NN.telecall.ru,cust-NN-NN.tsnet.ru,host-IP-DASHED.n.atel.suandtN-NN.sitek.netcover the other acquisitions. The group's own domain,cifra1.ru, shows up only on management hosts. - That mixture is the honest picture: mostly residential access with a real B2B tail, rather than a single clean consumer network.
Interesting
- Multiple retail brands sharing one AS is common for Russian consolidators. The giveaway is that the subscriber naming was never unified — a merger done in billing and BGP, but not in DNS.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| RU | Russian Federation | 41 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS8905- Registry name
- DIGIT1-AS
- Registrant
- Digit One LLC
- Abuse contact
- noc@almatel.ru
- Registered
- 2002-05-31
- Last changed
- 2022-06-22
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere