asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS8841 US-NYC-MARLINK-MSS Marlink MSS division New York AS

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 4.10K 3 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly NO
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Marlink (MSS division, New York)

Global · AI-generated

enterprise satellite legacy

US-NYC-MARLINK-MSS is held by Marlink AS, the Norwegian-rooted maritime and

remote-site satellite connectivity provider. The handle names Marlink's MSS

(Mobile Satellite Services, the L-band Inmarsat/Iridium side of the business) and

its New York presence.

What it's used for

  • Addressing behind satellite terminals: vessels, offshore platforms and remote land sites that Marlink connects. The AS in Marlink AS is Norwegian aksjeselskap, a company suffix, not "autonomous system".

Notable

  • Small and quiet: three prefixes, roughly 4,096 IPv4 addresses, only three observed BGP neighbours, and no IPv6. This is a service gateway, not a carrier backbone.
  • No PTRs came back on the addresses sampled. That is an observation about those addresses, not a claim that the zone is undelegated.
  • These addresses should not be geolocated. Marlink's customer terminals move with the ships and rigs they are bolted to, and the space is RIPE-registered 193.220.0.0/16 despite the US-NYC handle. The New York label describes a gateway, not where the endpoints are.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Address space

Summary

Full explorer
CountryNamePrefixes
NONorway3

Registry

Allocation record

via RIPE RDAP
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS8841
Registry name
US-NYC-MARLINK-MSS
Registrant
Marlink-MNT
Abuse contact
lir-abuse@marlink.com
Registered
2002-02-25
Last changed
2019-05-02
Status
active

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check