Autonomous system
AS8582 GTT-AS
Unclassified RIPE
Summary
GTT Communications Netherlands
hosting cloud legacy
GTT-AS is a small Dutch autonomous system of GTT Communications, the
international carrier. GTT's main backbone is a different, much larger AS; this one
is a legacy registration inherited through GTT's acquisitions in the Netherlands.
What it's used for
- Two /22s, about 2,000 IPv4 addresses, from
128.127.152.0/21. The RIPE netname on that space isNL-IRTCLOUD-20111017— Interoute cloud/virtual-data-centre addressing, from the pan-European carrier GTT acquired in 2018. - Eight observed neighbours and no downstream networks, so it functions as a service-hosting AS rather than as transit, despite the parent's carrier business.
Notable
- No PTRs came back on the addresses sampled inside the announced prefixes. That is not proof the reverse zones are undelegated, but it means rDNS offers no further evidence about what runs there.
- The AS was first seen originating
212.104.192.0/18back in 2000, a block it no longer announces. The number has been passed along through a chain of European carrier mergers.
Interesting
- The classification here follows the address space, not the holder. GTT is a transit carrier, but this particular AS carries a small pocket of hosted cloud addressing — a good example of why a subsidiary's AS should not inherit its parent's kind.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| NL | Netherlands | 1 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS8582- Registry name
- GTT-AS
- Registrant
- AS3257-ROOT-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@gtt.net
- Registered
- 2002-08-05
- Last changed
- 2022-01-12
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere