Autonomous system
AS8305 NETLIFE NetLife AS
Unclassified RIPE
Summary
NetLife (Yuri Lebedev)
legacy
NetLife is a very small Russian network. The AS number and its single prefix are
registered not to a company but to an individual, Yuri Lebedev, and the whole
inventory is one provider-independent /24, 95.215.149.0/24, named
NetLife-Network in the RIPE database.
What it's used for
- Whatever the operator runs on that one
/24. The little reverse DNS that exists points atnetlife.proinfrastructure hosts (a gateway and a mail server) plus a single Russian company domain, which reads as a small operator's own network with perhaps a customer or two on it. - The AS is multihomed on paper. Its registry object lists several regional Russian uplinks, though only one upstream is visible in routing.
Notable
- Too small and too quiet to classify honestly. 256 addresses with three published names is not enough evidence to call this hosting, business or access space, so it is deliberately left in no category rather than guessed at.
- Do not read early-internet pedigree into the low AS number here. The registry objects for both the AS and the
/24were created in 2015, and the95.215.0.0range is modern RIPE space: this is a low number in modern hands, not an original 1990s allocation. - The
NetLifename is used by unrelated providers in other countries. Nothing here connects to them.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| RU | Russian Federation | 1 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS8305- Registry name
- NetLife
- Registrant
- LEBEDEV-MNT
- Abuse contact
- support@netlife.pro
- Registered
- 2015-10-20
- Last changed
- 2025-07-04
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere