Observed topology
AS8241 RELLINE-AS
Unclassified RIPE NSP
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS8241: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35598 | INETCOM CARRIER LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 84 |
| AS57174 | Nets and Services JCS | Unclassified | IPv4 | 44 |
| AS20764 | CJSC RASCOM | Unclassified | IPv4 | 28 |
| AS62255 | BiMajLink d.o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 22 |
| AS1299 | Arelion Sweden AB | Transit | IPv4 | 9 |
| AS49673 | Truenetwork LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 3 |
| AS9049 | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | Unclassified | IPv4 | 1 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS8241 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS8241 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS209759 | Moy Telecom LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 576 |
| AS20764 | CJSC RASCOM | Unclassified | IPv4 | 397 |
| AS35598 | INETCOM CARRIER LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 175 |
| AS1299 | Arelion Sweden AB | Transit | IPv4 | 152 |
| AS202599 | United Telecommunications Corporation LTD | Unclassified | IPv4 | 100 |
| AS62255 | BiMajLink d.o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 91 |
| AS39156 | First Telecom Ltd | Unclassified | IPv4 | 56 |
| AS57174 | Nets and Services JCS | Unclassified | IPv4 | 48 |
| AS25478 | iHome LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 40 |
| AS49673 | Truenetwork LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 17 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-19 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.17M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.