asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS7871 SEIDATA

Residential ARIN

IPv4 addresses 24.58K 4 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 3 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

SEI Data (SEI Communications)

United States · AI-generated

isp legacy

SEIDATA is the internet network of SEI Data, Inc., the data arm of SEI Communications in Dillsboro, Indiana — a member-owned rural telephone cooperative serving several counties in the state's south-eastern corner.

What it's used for

  • Consumer and small-business internet access across the cooperative's rural footprint, alongside the co-op's own infrastructure.
  • Reverse DNS makes the split obvious: infrastructure sits on names like gw.seidata.com, ns1.seidata.com and mx2.seidata.com, while the bulk of the space is subscriber pools of the form CODE.jv.pool.seidata.com and CODE.sj.pool.seidata.com, where the middle label identifies the serving location.

Notable

  • An eyeball network, not hosting or transit: roughly 24,000 IPv4 addresses, nearly all of it dynamic customer space, plus an IPv6 /32.
  • The ASN was registered with ARIN in 1997, when a rural co-op getting its own BGP presence was still unusual; its oldest block, 206.162.192.0/19, dates from the same period.

Interesting

  • Rural telephone cooperatives like this one are a distinctive feature of the US address landscape: small, independent, member-owned, and often holding legacy ASNs and address space out of proportion to their subscriber counts.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

3 upstream, 0 downstream and 5 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS13807Great Plains Communications LLC194
AS6461Zayo Bandwidth64
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLC39

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-25, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 4 prefixes · 24.58K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America5

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS7871
Registry name
SEIDATA
Registrant
SEI Data, Inc.
Abuse contact
abuse@seidata.com
Registered
1997-02-03
Last changed
1999-09-02
Allocation
assigned

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
SEI Data, Inc.
Also known as
SEI Communications
Scope
Regional
Traffic ratio
Mostly Inbound
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RADB::RS-SEID
Website
http://www.seicommunications.com

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 5 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS7871
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 5 of 5 announcements
Route objects
10 naming AS7871

Reputation

Classification and threat

Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 443 networks and 1,779 prefixes, as published 2026-10-24. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check