asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS7716 WORLEY-AS-AP Worley Organisation Australia

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 256 1 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly AU
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 1 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Worley Organisation Australia

Australia · AI-generated

unclassified legacy

WORLEY-AS-AP is registered to WORLEY Australia Inc, an APNIC Local Internet Registry with an Australian country code. What the AS actually routes, however, does not line up with the name, and this one should be treated with caution.

What it's used for

  • It announces exactly one /24, 203.20.241.0/24. That prefix is not registered to Worley: APNIC records it under the netname TCR and the organisation TCR Holdings Limited, described in the registry as an ISP, with an incident-response contact registered in New Zealand.
  • Its sole upstream is a small provider registered in Thailand. There are no downstream networks.
  • Reverse DNS on the block is a bare, domainless placeholder of the form 203-20-241-NNN. — a dotted-quad with no suffix at all, which tells you nothing about who is using the addresses.

Notable

  • The holder name, the prefix registrant and the transit path point at three different parties in three different countries. That combination — an old corporate-looking ASN, a single prefix belonging to an unrelated third party, a distant unrelated upstream, and placeholder reverse DNS — is the pattern of address space being routed on someone else's behalf rather than a company running its own network.
  • These addresses should not be geolocated to the named holder, and should not be assumed to be in Australia.
  • Do not assume a link to the ASX-listed engineering firm of a similar name. Nothing in the routing or the prefix registration supports it, and a familiar-looking corporate name in an ASN record is not evidence on its own.

Interesting

  • APNIC has held the aut-num since the late 1990s. The number is old; the way it is being used today is not obviously connected to whoever originally obtained it.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

1 upstream, 0 downstream and 1 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS138466DataMossa Co., Ltd.60

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-27, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 1 prefixes · 256 addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
AUAustralia1

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS7716
Registry name
WORLEY-AS-AP
Registrant
WORLEY Australia Inc
Abuse contact
abuse@worley.org.au
Registered
2008-09-04
Last changed
2020-07-15
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 1 with no ROA
ROAs
3 authorising AS7716
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 1 of 1 announcements
Route objects
15 naming AS7716

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 446 networks and 1,852 prefixes, as published 2026-10-27. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check