Autonomous system
AS7622 ASN-KAIST-SAL Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Education APNIC
Summary
KAIST (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
education research legacy
ASN-KAIST-SAL belongs to the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea's flagship national research university, based in the Daedeok Innopolis science park in Daejeon.
What it's used for
- A single large allocation,
110.76.64.0/18, held by KAIST as portable space. The registry's technical contact is the campus itself, at Daehak-ro in Yuseong-gu, Daejeon. - Campus and laboratory connectivity: students, staff, departments and research groups. Addresses in the block geolocate to Daejeon and resolve to the
kaist.edudomain where reverse DNS is published at all.
Notable
- Institutional address space. Traffic from it is far more likely to be a lab machine, a research testbed or a student on campus than a home broadband user, and there are no subscriber-style pools anywhere in the range.
- Reverse DNS coverage is thin, which is common for Korean research networks. The allocation record, not the rDNS, is the load-bearing evidence here.
Interesting
- The
SALin the handle is not expanded anywhere in the registry, and no authoritative source explains it, so this card does not guess at it. KAIST is a large enough institution that it appears under more than one ASN; AS7622 is one piece of its routing, not the whole university.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| KR | Korea, Republic of | 1 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS7622- Registry name
- ASN-KAIST-SAL-KR
- Abuse contact
- hostmaster@nic.or.kr
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Education University, school or national research and education network.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere