asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS7393 CYBERCON

Hosting ARIN

IPv4 addresses 55.55K 129 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Cybercon, Inc.

United States · AI-generated

hosting legacy

CYBERCONCybercon, Inc., a data-centre and hosting company founded in 1995

and operating out of 210 N. Tucker Blvd. in downtown St. Louis, Missouri, one of

the city's main carrier hotels.

What it's used for

  • Colocation, dedicated servers, and private-cloud hosting. Reverse DNS on the announced space is unmistakably hosting: names like cp12.ezhostingserver.com and platinum.classcreator.com — control panels and customer web properties.
  • The ASN announces roughly 55k IPv4 addresses across ~140 prefixes.

Notable

  • Hosting address space, not eyeball: no DSL, cable, or CGNAT-style subscriber hostnames appear anywhere in the block.
  • The prefix list is worth noting for its shape — a US-registered ASN announcing a long tail of mostly-/24 prefixes drawn from European (RIPE) address ranges alongside its ARIN space. That pattern usually means leased or acquired address blocks rather than organically grown allocations.

Interesting

  • Cybercon is one of the older independent hosting companies still operating under its original name, with an ASN registered in 1996 — barely a year after the company was founded.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Address space

Summary

Full explorer
CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America130

Registry

Allocation record

via ARIN RDAP
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS7393
Registry name
CYBERCON
Registrant
CYBERCON, INC.
Abuse contact
abuse@cybercon.com
Registered
1996-12-02
Last changed
2011-06-23
Status
active

Reputation

Classification and threat

Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check