Autonomous system
AS6515 DACSIX-EAST
Unclassified ARIN
Summary
DACS-IX
hosting legacy
AS6515 belongs to DACS-IX, a Maryland-based operator that runs internet-exchange fabrics in the Washington–Baltimore corridor and sells ISP and cloud services under the DACS-NX and DACS Cloud names. ARIN registered the ASN in 2019, so despite the low number there is no early-internet pedigree here.
What it's used for
- Routed ISP and cloud addressing, not the exchange fabric itself. The announced
/24s carry netnamesSPG-ISP-REASSIGN-BLOCK1andBLOCK2registered to DACS Cloud, which is customer-reassignment space. - Reverse DNS resolves to gateway routers under
dacs-nx.net(for example abwi1gateway, i.e. the Baltimore–Washington area), confirming this is the operator's own transit and hosting network.
Notable
- The registered address is a Silver Spring, Maryland data-centre facility, and the company's exchange presence spans sites including Baltimore, Ashburn, Reston, Atlanta, Orlando and New York.
- Do not confuse this AS with the peering LAN. An IXP operator's company AS and its exchange fabric are different things; only the former originates routes, and that is what AS6515 does.
Interesting
- The registry has carried several names for this ASN over the years (
DACSIX-EAST,DACSNX-ISP,DACSNX-APEX), reflecting the operator's split between its exchange, ISP and cloud brands.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| US | United States of America | 9 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- ARIN
- Handle
AS6515- Registry name
- DACSNX-APEX
- Registrant
- DACS-IX
- Abuse contact
- noc@dacs-nx.com
- Registered
- 2019-08-29
- Last changed
- 2026-03-18
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere