asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS63027 LANICOM-NET

Residential ARIN Cable/DSL/ISP

IPv4 addresses 1.28K 4 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 2 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 2 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 4 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Lanicom / Skymesh

United States of America · AI-generated

isp business it-services

The AS handle LANICOM-NET is held by Lanicom, LLC, which operates under the trade name Skymesh.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries mixed traffic, with netnames SKYMESH-IPV4-01 and SKYMESH-IPV4-02 and reverse DNS entries pointing to skymesh.net, alongside LANICOM-IPV4-NET and lanicom.net records.
  • The network announces 1280 IPv4 addresses across 4 prefixes and 2 IPv6 prefixes, with 4 observed neighbours, indicating a small-scale access or business network rather than a transit provider.
  • Traffic from this AS consists of IT services and support for small and medium-sized businesses, as well as cable/DSL/ISP services in North America.

Notable

  • Registrants include both Skymesh, Inc and Lanicom, LLC, reflecting the dual branding of the operator.
  • Lanicom, LLC operates as Skymesh, a business name change or rebranding of the original IT services company.
  • The inventory is finely subdivided into four distinct IPv4 prefixes, consistent with an internal corporate estate or small ISP footprint.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 2 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
Detroit Internet ExchangeDetroit, United States209.124.52.79
Ohio IXColumbus, United States206.53.204.27

Transit providers

4 upstream, 0 downstream and 6 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS174Cogent Communications, LLC219
AS10796Charter Communications Inc39
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC36
AS20205Amplex Electric, Inc.6

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 4 prefixes · 1.28K addresses IPv6 2 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America6

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS63027
Registry name
LANICOM-NET
Registrant
Lanicom, LLC
Abuse contact
tjboone@lanicom.com
Registered
2014-01-06
Last changed
2025-04-02
Allocation
assigned

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
Lanicom / Skymesh
Also known as
dba Skymesh
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
North America
Traffic ratio
Heavy Inbound
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
ARIN::AS-LANICOM
Present at
2 exchanges
Website
http://www.lanicom.com

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 6 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
6 authorising AS63027
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 6 of 6 announcements
Route objects
8 naming AS63027

Reputation

Classification and threat

Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check