asn.dev

Observed topology

AS6233 XTOM

Upstreams 6 carry this network
Downstreams 5 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 12
Adjacent (IPv6) 8

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS6233: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv61,503
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv41,139
AS6453TATA COMMUNICATIONS (AMERICA) INCTransitIPv4 IPv6983
AS5511Orange S.A.TransitIPv4 IPv6288
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv680
AS10099China Unicom GlobalUnclassifiedIPv436

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS6233 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS212512Detai Prosperous Technologies LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6137
AS32727SB Professional ServicesUnclassifiedIPv4122
AS917Misaka Network, Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv662
AS24013SB Professional ServicesHostingIPv4 IPv632
AS400679Uberduck, LLCUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

20 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS6233 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv61,813
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv41,195
AS6453TATA COMMUNICATIONS (AMERICA) INCTransitIPv4 IPv61,168
AS5511Orange S.A.TransitIPv4 IPv6303
AS3204xTom OUHostingIPv4 IPv6199
AS212512Detai Prosperous Technologies LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6137
AS32727SB Professional ServicesUnclassifiedIPv4122
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv681
AS917Misaka Network, Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv676
AS10099China Unicom GlobalUnclassifiedIPv436
AS24013SB Professional ServicesHostingIPv4 IPv632
AS400679Uberduck, LLCUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS6233, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 10 exchanges across 6 countries and 3 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
LINX LON1London, United Kingdom195.66.227.193925
KleyReX Internet ExchangeFrankfurt, Germany193.189.82.127475
Seattle Internet ExchangeSeattle, United States2001:504:16::1859350
London Network Access PointLondon, United Kingdom2001:7f8:17::1859:1316
Speed Internet ExchangeDronten, Netherlands185.1.222.84292
DE-CIX New YorkNew York, United States2001:504:36::1859:0:1279
JPIX TokyoTokyo, Japan210.171.225.39259
Equinix Internet Exchange San Jose (Bay Area)San Jose, United States206.223.116.72193
Northwest Access ExchangePortland, United States198.32.195.123105
YYCIX Calgary Internet ExchangeCalgary, Canada206.126.225.51100

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.