Autonomous system
AS6222 CENTURYLINK-LEGACY-EMBARQ-CLTN
Residential ARIN
Summary
CenturyLink Communications, LLC (legacy Embarq)
isp legacy
CENTURYLINK-LEGACY-EMBARQ-CLTN is one of the autonomous systems CenturyLink
(now Lumen) inherited from Embarq, and it still carries consumer
broadband. Registered to CenturyLink Communications, LLC in Monroe, Louisiana.
What it's used for
- Residential and small-business internet access on the former Embarq footprint.
- Announces roughly 53,000 IPv4 addresses across about 37 prefixes.
Notable
- The reverse DNS is unambiguous: addresses resolve as
…dyn.embarqhsd.netand…sta.embarqhsd.net— Embarq High Speed Data, withdynandstamarking dynamic and static subscriber assignments. This is an eyeball network, not backbone or hosting space. - Embarq was Sprint's local telephone division, spun off in 2006 and merged with CenturyTel in 2009 to form CenturyLink. Two corporate generations later, the subscriber DNS still says "embarq".
Interesting
- Large carriers keep many acquired ASNs alive rather than renumbering customers, so a single company can hold dozens of them. When reasoning about a CenturyLink/Lumen address, the specific ASN matters: this one is broadband subscribers, while its neighbours [AS6223](https://asn.ipinfo.app/AS6223) and [AS6224](https://asn.ipinfo.app/AS6224) are a wholly different, federal service.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| US | United States of America | 39 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- ARIN
- Handle
AS6222- Registry name
- CENTURYLINK-LEGACY-EMBARQ-CLTN
- Registrant
- CenturyLink Communications, LLC
- Abuse contact
- abuse@aup.lumen.com
- Last changed
- 2018-08-14
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere