Autonomous system
AS6141 GRINNELL-MUTUAL-REINSURANCE-COMPANY
Unclassified ARIN
Summary
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
enterprise legacy
GRINNELL-MUTUAL-REINSURANCE-COMPANY is Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company, an insurance and reinsurance business headquartered in Grinnell, Iowa. It is a corporate enterprise network.
What it's used for
- Connectivity for the insurer's own business: corporate offices, staff, and the policy and claims systems behind them. The ASN exists so the company can multi-home rather than depend on a single carrier.
- It announces exactly one /24,
192.33.191.0/24, for 256 addresses. That is a minimal routed presence, which is typical of an enterprise that runs almost everything internally.
Notable
- An enterprise address: IPs here belong to an insurance company's own infrastructure. There are no subscribers, no hosted third parties, and no consumer traffic behind them.
- The ARIN registration date falls in a known bulk-registration batch, so it does not establish how long the number has been held. No early-internet pedigree should be read into the low number here.
Interesting
- Grinnell Mutual works largely through a network of local farm mutual insurers across the American Midwest, a quietly substantial business whose entire internet footprint fits inside a single /24.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| US | United States of America | 1 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- ARIN
- Handle
AS6141- Registry name
- GRINNELL-MUTUAL-REINSURANCE-COMPANY
- Registrant
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
- Abuse contact
- gbosse@gmrc.com
- Registered
- 2009-10-07
- Last changed
- 2012-02-24
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere