asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS61134 SAFELOCKAS Abuse: internet.jejkowice@gmail.com phone: +48 666 666 041

Residential RIPE Cable/DSL/ISP

IPv4 addresses 1.28K 4 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly PL
Exchanges 1 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 6 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Safe-Lock.Net

Poland · AI-generated

isp residential cable regional

SAFELOCKAS is operated by Safe-Lock.Net, a regional internet service provider in Poland.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries residential and small-business customer traffic, evidenced by reverse DNS entries such as client64.safe-lock.net, client127.safe-lock.net, and cloud.safe-lock.net.
  • The AS announces 1280 IPv4 addresses across 4 prefixes and 1 IPv6 prefix, while maintaining 8 observed routing neighbours. This ratio of address space to peering partners indicates an access network rather than a transit provider.
  • Traffic from this AS consists of subscriber eyeballs and local web endpoints for customers in the Jejkowice area of Poland, consistent with its classification as a Cable/DSL/ISP.

Notable

  • All registrants for the announced prefixes are listed as Dawid Partyka or Safe-Lock.Net NOC, with netnames SAFELOCKN and SAFELOCK-NET, which aligns directly with the AS holder.
  • The address inventory is composed of four distinct IPv4 blocks, including a /23 and three /24s, all located in Poland.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
TPIX - Internet ExchangeWarsaw, Poland195.149.234.115

Transit providers

6 upstream, 0 downstream and 10 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS50607Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie200
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC48
AS62081Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie8
AS201054Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie7
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbH6
AS24482SG.GS5

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-18, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 4 prefixes · 1.28K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
PLPoland5

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS61134
Registry name
SAFELOCKAS
Registrant
LEON-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@safe-lock.net
Registered
2013-02-05
Last changed
2026-03-27
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
Safe-Lock.Net Dawid Partyka
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Regional
Traffic ratio
Mostly Inbound
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-SAFELOCK
Present at
3 exchanges
Website
https://www.safe-lock.net

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 5 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
5 authorising AS61134
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 5 of 5 announcements
Route objects
6 naming AS61134

Reputation

Classification and threat

Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,784 prefixes, as published 2026-10-19. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check