Observed topology

AS59945 HYNASINSKI-AS

Residential RIPE

Upstreams 5 carry this network

Downstreams 1 this network carries

Adjacent (IPv4) 7

Adjacent (IPv6) 0

Upstream graph Who carries AS59945, and who carries them, drawn as a map up to the transit-free core. 1 exchange Where AS59945 physically turns up to peer, and its address on each fabric.

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS59945: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

AS	Network	Type	Families	Paths seen
AS62081	Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie	Unclassified	IPv4	152
AS5617	Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna	Mobile	IPv4	60
AS50607	Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie	Unclassified	IPv4	40
AS33891	Core-Backbone GmbH	Hosting	IPv4	8
AS24482	SG.GS	Hosting	IPv4	4

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS59945 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

AS	Network	Type	Families	Paths seen
AS215985	Gmina Poddebice	Unclassified	IPv4	33

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

observed

Every AS seen directly next to AS59945 in a routing path, in either direction.

AS	Network	Type	Families	Paths seen
AS62081	Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie	Unclassified	IPv4	152
AS5617	Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna	Mobile	IPv4	80
AS50607	Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie	Unclassified	IPv4	44
AS215985	Gmina Poddebice	Unclassified	IPv4	33
AS6939	Hurricane Electric LLC	Transit	IPv4	8
AS33891	Core-Backbone GmbH	Hosting	IPv4	8
AS24482	SG.GS	Hosting	IPv4	5

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-24 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 72.94M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.