Autonomous system
AS59371 DNC-AS - Dimension Network & Communication Limited
Hosting APNIC Content
Summary
Dimension Network & Communication Limited
hosting business hk
DNC-AS is operated by Dimension Network & Communication Limited.
What it's used for
- The address space carries web hosting and general business traffic, evidenced by netnames
LBIL-HK(Large Bright Web Hosting) andLAYERLINKS-HK(Layerlinks Global Limited). - The AS announces 60,928 IPv4 addresses across 35 prefixes, with 17 observed neighbours, indicating a hosting or business access role rather than a transit provider.
- Traffic from this AS consists of web hosting endpoints and corporate network services for clients in the Asia-Pacific region.
Notable
- Registrants include Dimension Network & Communication Limited, Layerlinks Global Limited, and Large Bright Investments Limited, with netnames
DNC-HK,LAYERLINKS-HK, andLBIL-HKrespectively. - The address inventory is a mix of /20 and /22 blocks, including ranges from 5.254.144.0/20 to 103.232.220.0/22, reflecting a consolidated hosting estate.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong Internet Exchange | Hong Kong, China | 123.255.90.137 |
Transit providers
9 upstream, 1 downstream and 11 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
| AS | Network | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|
| AS3257 | GTT Communications Inc. | 4,907 |
| AS3491 | PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. | 4,417 |
| AS2914 | NTT America, Inc. | 1,713 |
| AS4635 | Hong Kong Internet Exchange--Route Server 1 | 411 |
| AS13335 | Cloudflare, Inc. | 391 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | 203 |
| AS8359 | MTS PJSC | 200 |
| AS9930 | TIME dotCom Berhad No. 14, Jalan Majistret U1/26 Hicom Glenmarie Industrial Park 40150 Shah Alam Selangor, Malaysia | 9 |
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-11-02, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 35 prefixes · 60.93K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| HK | Hong Kong | 35 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS59371- Registry name
- DNC-AS
- Registrant
- Dimension Network & Communication Limited
- Abuse contact
- netadm@dimensionet.com
- Registered
- 2014-06-06
- Last changed
- 2020-08-19
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- Dimension Network
- Also known as
- DNC
- Network type
- Content
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Traffic ratio
- Mostly Outbound
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
RADB::AS59371- Present at
- 1 exchanges
- Facilities
- 2 facilities
- Website
- http://www.dimensionet.com
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 0% valid · 0 valid, 216 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 5 authorising AS59371
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 216 of 216 announcements
- Route objects
- 307 naming AS59371
Reputation
Classification and threat
Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 449 networks and 1,846 prefixes, as published 2026-11-03. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere