asn.dev

Observed topology

AS57717 FBX-AS

Upstreams 7 carry this network
Downstreams 7 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 12
Adjacent (IPv6) 7

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS57717: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4194
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv4 IPv6153
AS5511Orange S.A.TransitIPv4 IPv666
AS3257GTT Communications Inc.TransitIPv464
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv662
AS202425IP Volume incUnclassifiedIPv431
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv62

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS57717 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS202425IP Volume incUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv63,053
AS62068SpectraIP B.V.HostingIPv4724
AS56611REBA Communications BVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6476
AS49870Alsycon B.V.HostingIPv4337
AS199834IP Solus IncUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6284
AS48090TECHOFF SRV LIMITEDHostingIPv4183
AS204615IP Fiber IncUnclassifiedIPv462

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

21 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS57717 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS202425IP Volume incUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv64,857
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv4 IPv63,285
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv42,682
AS3257GTT Communications Inc.TransitIPv4866
AS62068SpectraIP B.V.HostingIPv4749
AS56611REBA Communications BVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6476
AS5511Orange S.A.TransitIPv4 IPv6428
AS49870Alsycon B.V.HostingIPv4409
AS199834IP Solus IncUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6408
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6247
AS48090TECHOFF SRV LIMITEDHostingIPv4183
AS204615IP Fiber IncUnclassifiedIPv462
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv62

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS57717, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
LayerSwitch Internet ExchangeThe Hague, Netherlands185.1.32.50105

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.