asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS56515 OXYNET-AS

Unclassified RIPE Cable/DSL/ISP

IPv4 addresses 13.31K 3 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly PL
Exchanges 2 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 9 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

OXYNET

Poland · AI-generated

isp residential regional cable

OXYNET-AS is operated by OXYNET sp. z o.o.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries subscriber traffic, evidenced by reverse DNS entries like 31-128-8-0.ip.oxynet.pl and netnames such as SYSTEMX-II and PL-INFORMEL.
  • The AS announces 13,312 IPv4 addresses across 3 prefixes and 1 IPv6 prefix, while maintaining 18 observed neighbours; this ratio of address volume to peering partners indicates a regional access network rather than a transit provider.
  • As a cable and DSL ISP based in Poznań, the traffic consists of residential and small business subscriber eyeballs connected via fixed-line infrastructure.

Notable

  • All registrants for the announced prefixes are listed as Dzial sieci OXYNET; OXYNET sp. z o.o., fully aligning with the AS holder.
  • The inventory is composed of three distinct IPv4 blocks: 31.128.0.0/19, 176.110.144.0/20, and 185.24.164.0/22, alongside a single IPv6 prefix 2a04:2b40::/29.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 2 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
TPIX - Internet ExchangeWarsaw, Poland195.149.232.254
Equinix Internet Exchange WarsawWarsaw, Poland195.182.218.56

Transit providers

9 upstream, 0 downstream and 11 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS29535Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna614
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbH156
AS24115Equinix104
AS174Cogent Communications, LLC60
AS24482SG.GS53
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC15
AS5617Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna3
AS29632Netassist International EOOD2

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-26, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 3 prefixes · 13.31K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
PLPoland4

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS56515
Registry name
OXYNET-AS
Registrant
OXYNET sp. z o.o.
Abuse contact
dso@oxynet.pl
Registered
2011-03-08
Last changed
2019-03-08
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
OXYNET
Also known as
OXYNET
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Regional
Traffic ratio
Mostly Inbound
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-SYSTEMX
Present at
2 exchanges
Facilities
1 facilities
Website
http://www.oxynet.pl

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 56 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
4 authorising AS56515
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 56 of 56 announcements
Route objects
57 naming AS56515

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 446 networks and 1,852 prefixes, as published 2026-10-27. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check