asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS5589 OPEN-FC-1-AS

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 4.10K 13 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly RU
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

BM-Bank (formerly Otkritie FC Bank)

Russia · AI-generated

enterprise legacy

OPEN-FC-1-AS is a Russian banking network. The handle stands for Otkritie Financial Corporation ("otkritie" means open, and the abuse contact is still abuse@open.ru); Otkritie FC Bank was reorganised into JSC "BM-Bank" by accession at the start of 2025, and the RIPE registration follows the surviving entity.

What it's used for

Corporate infrastructure for a large Russian bank — internet-facing banking services, branch and office connectivity, and the network edge fronting its customer-facing systems. About 4,000 IPv4 addresses, small and purpose-built rather than a service-provider pool.

Notable

This is an end-user enterprise network, not a provider. Its upstreams are Russian incumbents — Rostelecom and VimpelCom — and the AS exists to multihome the bank's own address space rather than to sell connectivity to anyone else.

Interesting

The registry name lags the corporate reality by design: the OPEN-FC handle predates the merger, so a lookup shows the Otkritie-era identity attached to BM-Bank's org record. It is a good example of why an AS name should never be treated as the current legal holder.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Address space

Summary

Full explorer
CountryNamePrefixes
RURussian Federation13

Registry

Allocation record

via RIPE RDAP
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS5589
Registry name
OPEN-FC-1-AS
Registrant
OPEN-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@open.ru
Registered
2009-01-15
Last changed
2026-06-09
Status
active

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check