asn.dev

Observed topology

AS52527 IWNET TELECOM LTDA ME

Upstreams 7 carry this network
Downstreams 5 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 12
Adjacent (IPv6) 9

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS52527: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS264144ASAP GLOBAL TELECOMUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6670
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6612
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6381
AS52468UFINET PANAMA S.A.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6246
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv643
AS266409SECW TELECOMUnclassifiedIPv440
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv418

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS52527 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS271666JOSE HERNANI PEREIRA DE SOUZAUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6400
AS267998ASA GROUP MONITORAMENTO E SERVICOS DE TELECOMUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6400
AS267530TJ Telecom LTDA MEHostingIPv4 IPv6220
AS267366PLAYNET TELECOMUnclassifiedIPv4183
AS268643ga de matosUnclassifiedIPv435

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

21 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS52527 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS264144ASAP GLOBAL TELECOMUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv61,192
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv61,105
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6560
AS52468UFINET PANAMA S.A.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6542
AS271666JOSE HERNANI PEREIRA DE SOUZAUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6400
AS267998ASA GROUP MONITORAMENTO E SERVICOS DE TELECOMUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6400
AS268643ga de matosUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6332
AS267530TJ Telecom LTDA MEHostingIPv4 IPv6220
AS267366PLAYNET TELECOMUnclassifiedIPv4183
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv667
AS266409SECW TELECOMUnclassifiedIPv440
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv439

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS52527, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
IX.br (PTT.br) São PauloSão Paulo, Brazil187.16.213.592,690

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.