asn.dev

Observed topology

AS49814 TOMGATE-AS Internet Service Provider, Tomsk, Russia

Upstreams 11 carry this network
Downstreams 1 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 11
Adjacent (IPv6) 5

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS49814: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS12389PJSC RostelecomResidentialIPv4 IPv6285
AS3216PJSC "Vimpelcom"MobileIPv493
AS8359MTS PJSCMobileIPv4 IPv639
AS48858JSC "ER-Telecom Holding"UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv614
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv49
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv68
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv47
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv47
AS208972GIBIRNET ILETISIM HIZMETLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETIUnclassifiedIPv47
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv47
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv61

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS49814 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS214325OOO "T TELECOM"UnclassifiedIPv463

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

16 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS49814 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS12389PJSC RostelecomResidentialIPv4 IPv6323
AS3216PJSC "Vimpelcom"MobileIPv4109
AS214325OOO "T TELECOM"UnclassifiedIPv463
AS8359MTS PJSCMobileIPv4 IPv639
AS48858JSC "ER-Telecom Holding"UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv615
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv412
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv69
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv48
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv48
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv48
AS208972GIBIRNET ILETISIM HIZMETLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETIUnclassifiedIPv48
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS49814, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
MSK-IX NovosibirskNovosibirsk, Russia193.232.87.10559

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.