Autonomous system
AS49685 SIGNET-AS Signet B.V.
Unclassified RIPE NSP
Summary
Signet B.V.
isp residential netherlands broadband
SIGNET-AS is operated by Signet B.V., a Dutch broadband provider based in Eindhoven.
What it's used for
- The address space carries residential and business broadband traffic, evidenced by reverse DNS entries such as
static.centric.euandip-194-53-74-254.signet.nl, and netnames likeFFSMC-GOUDAandFFCENTRIC-PROD-3104. - The AS announces 2816 IPv4 addresses across 7 prefixes and 25 IPv6 prefixes, while maintaining 107 observed neighbours. This ratio of moderate address space against a high neighbour count indicates a regional access network with significant peering and transit relationships.
- Traffic from this AS consists of subscriber eyeballs for residential and small business customers in the Netherlands, utilizing the infrastructure of Signet and its associated entities like Centric.
Notable
- Registrants include Centric Netherlands BV, Centric IT Solutions GmbH, and Signet Abuse Desk, reflecting a corporate structure where Signet operates alongside or has integrated with Centric entities.
- Signet B.V. is the successor to IT-Ernity Internet Services B.V., which is listed in peering databases as an NSP for the same website, indicating a rebranding or acquisition history.
- The inventory includes a mix of legacy and modern prefixes, with some blocks registered to Centric entities, suggesting a consolidated network estate.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 2 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| AMS-IX Amsterdam | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 80.249.209.148 |
| Neutral Internet Exchange | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 193.239.116.254 |
Transit providers
22 upstream, 1 downstream and 36 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-15, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 7 prefixes · 2.82K addresses IPv6 25 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| NL | Netherlands | 32 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS49685- Registry name
- signetbreedband
- Registrant
- Signet B.V.
- Abuse contact
- abuse@signet.nl
- Registered
- 2014-11-10
- Last changed
- 2026-08-03
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- IT-Ernity Internet Services B.V.
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- Europe
- Traffic ratio
- Balanced
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
RIPE::AS49685:AS-ALL- Present at
- 2 exchanges
- Facilities
- 2 facilities
- Website
- https://www.signetbreedband.nl
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 36 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 90 authorising AS49685
- ASPA
- 4 declared providers
- IRR
- 11% registered · 4 of 36 announcements 2 other origin
- Route objects
- 8 naming AS49685
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,782 prefixes, as published 2026-10-16. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere