asn.dev

Observed topology

AS49353 AS-JSANS

Upstreams 3 carry this network
Downstreams 16 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 19
Adjacent (IPv6) 1

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS49353: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS200845AVATEL TELECOM, SAResidentialIPv4 IPv659
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv430
AS43578TEMPLUS BARCELONA S.L.HostingIPv45

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS49353 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS212169CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4180
AS211500LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv4180
AS42457CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4180
AS211020LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv4120
AS42635CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4120
AS210415LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv4120
AS211142CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS211032LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS211803CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS211120CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS214986ENERI CLOUD SISTEMAS, SLUnclassifiedIPv460
AS39838Valor Information Technologies, S.L.UnclassifiedIPv460
AS205936COULD IT HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS204978LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS211165CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS31479Valor Information Technologies, S.L.UnclassifiedIPv460

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

20 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS49353 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv41,047
AS43578TEMPLUS BARCELONA S.L.HostingIPv4488
AS212169CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4180
AS42457CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4180
AS211500LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv4180
AS42635CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4120
AS211020LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv4120
AS210415LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv4120
AS211120CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS214986ENERI CLOUD SISTEMAS, SLUnclassifiedIPv460
AS211032LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS205936COULD IT HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS39838Valor Information Technologies, S.L.UnclassifiedIPv460
AS211165CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS31479Valor Information Technologies, S.L.UnclassifiedIPv460
AS211142CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS204978LOBOS NETWORKING LTDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS211803CARDOCK HOSTING LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv460
AS200845AVATEL TELECOM, SAResidentialIPv4 IPv659

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS49353, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it.

No exchange membership on file. That is not the same as peering nowhere: the dataset records what PCH has collected, and many exchanges publish no participant list at all.

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.