Autonomous system
AS4911 CENTURYLINK-LEGACY-QWEST-SPA-MARION
Unclassified ARIN
Summary
CenturyLink Communications (legacy Qwest)
transit legacy
CENTURYLINK-LEGACY-QWEST-SPA-MARION is one of the legacy Qwest autonomous systems now held by CenturyLink Communications, LLC, part of Lumen. The handle was rewritten during the CenturyLink/Qwest integration and preserves the Qwest lineage in its name.
What it's used for
- Carries a single large block of carrier address space announced behind Qwest's main backbone. Its only observed peer is [AS209](https://asn.ipinfo.app/AS209), the legacy Qwest backbone AS.
- Functions as a service-block AS rather than a backbone in its own right: it originates address space for carrier services and sits entirely inside the parent network.
Notable
- Distinguish this from the parent. AS4911 is a subordinate legacy Qwest AS, not the Qwest/CenturyLink backbone itself.
- Unlike most of its numeric neighbours, this ASN's ARIN registration dates to the mid-1990s, when Qwest-era carrier networks were being numbered. The number was not reissued to a modern holder.
Interesting
- The handle is an artifact of an acquisition chain: Qwest was absorbed by CenturyLink, which became Lumen, yet the ASN's name still carries the original operator's name and an internal service designation.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| US | United States of America | 1 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- ARIN
- Handle
AS4911- Registry name
- CENTURYLINK-LEGACY-QWEST-SPA-MARION
- Registrant
- CenturyLink Communications, LLC
- Abuse contact
- abuse@aup.lumen.com
- Registered
- 1995-05-04
- Last changed
- 2018-10-04
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere