asn.dev

Observed topology

AS46489

Not seen in any path

This AS number does not appear in any route we observed. That is normal for an AS that is allocated but not announcing, one used only privately, or one whose routes do not reach our collectors.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS46489, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 38 exchanges across 18 countries and 3 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany2001:7f8::b599:0:11,073
LINX LON1London, United Kingdom195.66.225.25925
Indonesian Internet Exchange (IIX-Jakarta)Jakarta, Indonesia123.108.9.221923
AMS-IX AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands80.249.210.197894
Neutral Internet ExchangeAmsterdam, Netherlands193.239.117.158665
France-IX ParisParis, France37.49.237.25570
Equinix Internet Exchange SingaporeSingapore, Singapore27.111.229.46490
Equinix Internet Exchange AshburnAshburn, United States206.126.236.193388
Seattle Internet ExchangeSeattle, United States206.81.81.54350
Any2 CaliforniaLos Angeles, United States206.72.210.165321
Hong Kong Internet ExchangeHong Kong, China123.255.90.46307
Equinix Internet Exchange WarsawWarsaw, Poland195.182.218.245300
Toronto Internet ExchangeToronto, Canada206.108.35.45286
Equinix Internet Exchange ChicagoChicago, United States208.115.136.193280
JPIX TokyoTokyo, Japan210.171.225.161259
Equinix Internet Exchange SydneySydney, Australia45.127.172.198238
DE-CIX MadridMadrid, Spain2001:7f8:a0::b599:0:1229
Equinix Internet Exchange DallasDallas, United States206.223.118.163225
Peering.czPrague, Czech Republic185.0.20.116212
IX Australia (Sydney NSW)Sydney, Australia218.100.52.157199
FL-IX - The Florida Internet Exchange / Community IX - FloridaMiami, United States206.41.108.58179
ESpanix Madrid Lower LANMadrid, Spain193.149.1.41177
Digital Realty Atlanta Internet ExchangeAtlanta, United States206.126.110.238175
Equinix Internet Exchange MiamiMiami, United States198.32.243.200175
Berlin Commercial Internet ExchangeBerlin, Germany193.178.185.106152
Taipei Internet Exchange (TPIX)Taipei, Taiwan203.163.222.93151
DE-CIX MarseilleMarseille, France2001:7f8:36::b599:0:1113
Northwest Access ExchangePortland, United States198.32.195.121105
Equinix Internet Exchange New YorkNew York, United States198.32.118.19898
CANIX Internet Exchange - MontrealMontreal, Canada198.179.18.7088
Bangkok Neutral Internet ExchangeBangkok, Thailand203.159.68.13478
Equinix Internet Exchange Palo AltoPalo Alto, United States198.32.176.23276
Equinix Los Angeles IBXLos Angeles, United States206.223.123.24772
Korea Internet Neutral Exchange KINXSeoul, South Korea139.150.100.18764
Salt Lake Internet ExchangeSalt Lake City, United States149.112.13.2938
Kolkata IXKolkata, India103.74.224.11833
Neutral Internet Exchange 2Amsterdam, Netherlands185.1.122.1919
MEX-IX McAllenMcAllen, United States206.71.142.1418

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.