asn.dev

Observed topology

AS44053 UNILINK-AS

Residential RIPE Cable/DSL/ISP

Upstreams 1 carry this network
Downstreams 3 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 4
Adjacent (IPv6) 0
Upstream graph Who carries AS44053, and who carries them, drawn as a map up to the transit-free core. 1 exchange Where AS44053 physically turns up to peer, and its address on each fabric.

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS44053: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS25227JSC "ER-Telecom Holding"UnclassifiedIPv4120

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS44053 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS57620JSC "ER-Telecom Holding"UnclassifiedIPv4240
AS198039Shneider Group LLCUnclassifiedIPv453
AS49779Joint-Stock Company InvestpriborUnclassifiedIPv42

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

observed

Every AS seen directly next to AS44053 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS25227JSC "ER-Telecom Holding"UnclassifiedIPv4415
AS57620JSC "ER-Telecom Holding"UnclassifiedIPv4240
AS198039Shneider Group LLCUnclassifiedIPv453
AS49779Joint-Stock Company InvestpriborUnclassifiedIPv42

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-21 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.14M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.