asn.dev

Observed topology

AS40929 MOEDOVE-BN

Upstreams 14 carry this network
Downstreams 3 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 9
Adjacent (IPv6) 15

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS40929: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS20473The Constant Company, LLCHostingIPv4 IPv61,337
AS27523Kawaii Networks LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6291
AS17433Hytron Network Services LimitedResidentialIPv6163
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv4 IPv6143
AS44324MoeDove LLCResidentialIPv4 IPv6117
AS216211CYBERVERSE LLCHostingIPv4 IPv689
AS202335Zhanrui TianUnclassifiedIPv681
AS955LSHIY LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv650
AS14447Infinitron Internet LLCHostingIPv621
AS40792CYBERVERSEUnclassifiedIPv614
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv66
AS53808MoeDoveUnclassifiedIPv41
AS204539Axivora Connect LtdResidentialIPv61
AS64515unnamedUnclassifiedIPv61

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS40929 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS203236Mingyang ShenUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6222
AS204211Hangzhou Yingyun Network Technology Co., Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv634
AS202335Zhanrui TianUnclassifiedIPv622

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

25 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS40929 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS20473The Constant Company, LLCHostingIPv4 IPv61,337
AS27523Kawaii Networks LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6329
AS203236Mingyang ShenUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6222
AS17433Hytron Network Services LimitedResidentialIPv6219
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv4 IPv6192
AS216211CYBERVERSE LLCHostingIPv4 IPv6148
AS44324MoeDove LLCResidentialIPv4 IPv6127
AS202335Zhanrui TianUnclassifiedIPv6111
AS955LSHIY LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv678
AS204211Hangzhou Yingyun Network Technology Co., Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv634
AS204539Axivora Connect LtdResidentialIPv625
AS14447Infinitron Internet LLCHostingIPv621
AS40792CYBERVERSEUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv615
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv610
AS53808MoeDoveUnclassifiedIPv42
AS64515unnamedUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS40929, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Taipei Internet Exchange (TPIX)Taipei, Taiwan203.163.223.52151

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.