Observed topology
AS39816 VOLTA-AS
Residential RIPE
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS39816: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS51465 | M3.NET Sp. zoo | Hosting | IPv4 | 590 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS39816 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS61434 | Ziaja Ltd Zaklad Produkcji Lekow sp z o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 59 |
| AS62308 | Bibus Menos Sp. z o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 59 |
| AS211746 | ETOS S. A. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 7 |
| AS51976 | JP-Telekom Sp z o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 6 |
| AS51590 | PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO HANDLOWOPRODUKCYJNOUSLUGOWE "ARONET" ANDRZEJ OLSZEWSKI | Unclassified | IPv4 | 3 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS39816 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS51465 | M3.NET Sp. zoo | Hosting | IPv4 | 724 |
| AS61434 | Ziaja Ltd Zaklad Produkcji Lekow sp z o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 59 |
| AS62308 | Bibus Menos Sp. z o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 59 |
| AS211746 | ETOS S. A. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 7 |
| AS51976 | JP-Telekom Sp z o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 6 |
| AS51590 | PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO HANDLOWOPRODUKCYJNOUSLUGOWE "ARONET" ANDRZEJ OLSZEWSKI | Unclassified | IPv4 | 3 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-21 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.14M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.