asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS39399 FENIXVT-AS

Unclassified RIPE NSP

IPv4 addresses 6.14K 5 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly UA
Exchanges 2 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 5 4 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Fenix VT

Ukraine · AI-generated

isp residential ukraine opensvit

FENIXVT-AS is operated by Fenix VT, a Ukrainian internet service provider.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries residential and business subscriber traffic, evidenced by reverse DNS entries pointing to opensvit.ua (e.g., ip-91-199-194-64.opensvit.ua) and netnames such as FENIXVT4-NET and FENIXVT-NET.
  • The AS announces 6,144 IPv4 addresses across 5 prefixes and 1 IPv6 prefix, while maintaining 15 observed neighbours; this ratio of address space to peering partners is characteristic of an access network serving end-users rather than a transit provider.
  • Traffic from this AS consists of subscriber eyeballs accessing the internet, with the opensvit.ua domain indicating the service brand provided to customers.

Notable

  • All registrants for the announced prefixes are listed as "Private Enterprise Firma Fenix VT", which aligns directly with the AS holder and the FENIXVT-AS handle.
  • The address inventory is composed of five distinct IPv4 blocks, including a /20 and a /22, alongside smaller /23 and /24 allocations, all registered under the same entity.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 2 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
Giganet Internet ExchangeKyiv, Ukraine185.1.62.27
GNM Internet Exchange UkraineKiev, Ukraine178.18.230.60

Transit providers

5 upstream, 4 downstream and 10 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS59497Buknet LLC305
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC18
AS15895"Kyivstar" PJSC15
AS3303Swisscom (Schweiz) AG11
AS29632Netassist International EOOD2

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-12, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 5 prefixes · 6.14K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
UAUkraine6

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS39399
Registry name
FENIXVT-AS
Registrant
FENIXVT-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@fenix-vt.net
Registered
2006-02-14
Last changed
2024-11-12
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
Fenix VT
Also known as
FENIXVT-AS
Network type
NSP
Scope
Europe
Traffic ratio
Balanced
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-FENIXVT
Present at
3 exchanges
Website
https://opensvit.ua

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
83% valid · 5 valid, 1 with no ROA
ROAs
5 authorising AS39399
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 6 of 6 announcements
Route objects
6 naming AS39399

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,769 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check