asn.dev

Observed topology

AS33185 HIVE-DATA-CENTER

Upstreams 10 carry this network
Downstreams 22 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 31
Adjacent (IPv6) 19

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS33185: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv6386
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6349
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6162
AS3257GTT Communications Inc.TransitIPv4 IPv6112
AS1403EBOXResidentialIPv4 IPv646
AS22652Videotron LteeResidentialIPv4 IPv638
AS852TELUS Communications Inc.ResidentialIPv4 IPv623
AS394256Tech Futures Interactive Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv622
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv622
AS3303Swisscom (Schweiz) AGResidentialIPv416

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS33185 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS398292Babish TelecomUnclassifiedIPv4348
AS398041XCD TelecomUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6269
AS398982Securitech Systems Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4116
AS205122Planisware SAHostingIPv4 IPv6111
AS400426SKYTECH COMMUNICATIONS INC.UnclassifiedIPv4100
AS396142Alkeron Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv695
AS19168XSOLI INC.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv695
AS204769DigiRDP, LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv695
AS400598CANIX Solutions & ServicesHostingIPv4 IPv694
AS54975InkbridgeUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv669
AS400696MIBURA, INC.UnclassifiedIPv467
AS399944ColdNorthAdminUnclassifiedIPv459
AS991BlackIP 360 Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv458
AS398995LuminetUnclassifiedIPv458
AS55021ottcolo inc.UnclassifiedIPv458
AS400032VickohmUnclassifiedIPv458
AS395262CENGN -Centre of Excellence in Next Generation NetworksUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv651
AS14731Beauce TelecomUnclassifiedIPv445
AS399760ZabblyUnclassifiedIPv444
AS399199Christie Innomed Inc.UnclassifiedIPv443
AS400792Blink Connect SolutionsHostingIPv637
AS26195Cyberri Technologies Inc.HostingIPv4 IPv619

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

50 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS33185 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv61,184
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6825
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6452
AS398041XCD TelecomUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6383
AS3257GTT Communications Inc.TransitIPv4 IPv6360
AS398292Babish TelecomUnclassifiedIPv4348
AS1403EBOXResidentialIPv4 IPv6128
AS398982Securitech Systems Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4116
AS205122Planisware SAHostingIPv4 IPv6111
AS22652Videotron LteeResidentialIPv4 IPv6105
AS400426SKYTECH COMMUNICATIONS INC.UnclassifiedIPv4100
AS396142Alkeron Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv695
AS19168XSOLI INC.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv695
AS204769DigiRDP, LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv695
AS400598CANIX Solutions & ServicesHostingIPv4 IPv694
AS54975InkbridgeUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv669
AS400696MIBURA, INC.UnclassifiedIPv467
AS852TELUS Communications Inc.ResidentialIPv4 IPv665
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv662
AS399944ColdNorthAdminUnclassifiedIPv459
AS55021ottcolo inc.UnclassifiedIPv458
AS398995LuminetUnclassifiedIPv458
AS400032VickohmUnclassifiedIPv458
AS991BlackIP 360 Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv458
AS395262CENGN -Centre of Excellence in Next Generation NetworksUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv651
AS394256Tech Futures Interactive Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv651
AS3303Swisscom (Schweiz) AGResidentialIPv447
AS14731Beauce TelecomUnclassifiedIPv445
AS399760ZabblyUnclassifiedIPv444
AS399199Christie Innomed Inc.UnclassifiedIPv443
AS400792Blink Connect SolutionsHostingIPv637
AS26195Cyberri Technologies Inc.HostingIPv4 IPv619

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS33185, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 5 exchanges across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Toronto Internet ExchangeToronto, Canada206.108.35.211286
CANIX Internet Exchange - MontrealMontreal, Canada198.179.18.10888
CANIX Internet Exchange - OttawaOttawa, Canada206.82.110.1415
CANIX Internet Exchange - TorontoToronto, Canada149.112.134.59
CANIX Internet Exchange - QuebecQuebec, Canada149.112.119.26

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.